|
They
were children, acting out the pornography they had seen.
One boy was 12. He learned it from watching cable TV and
clicking on pornographic "pop-ups" on the Internet.
Another boy was 13. He watched it on cable and the Net.
The girl was about the same age. She saw it on TV. All
imitated the pornography they had witnessed, engaging
in acts that police say went far beyond any normal sexual
experimentation that might occur at that age. None had
been in any trouble before. All came from good homes.
Their victims were boys and girls. All under 12. All their
friends.
Since
last summer, Hamilton police have conducted three investigations
into children who have been exposed to porn and then used
their newfound knowledge to sexually assault other children.
Child abuse Detective Rick Arnold say there are several
similar investigations now under way. It is a recent and
profoundly disturbing trend that has police questioning
the roots of the children's behaviour. It is such a rare
occurrence that one forensic psychiatrist calls it "uncharted
territory."
Even
the best kids need to have parental supervision over their
TV and Internet use, says Arnold. And parents need to
keep the lines of communication - especially about sex
- open. "Parents can have control over this,"
Arnold said.
The
actions of these three youths is more likely the result
of misguided experimentation and imitation than deep-rooted
deviance, says Dr. Steven Hucker, head of forensic psychiatry
at McMaster University and an expert in sexual psychopathology.
Children with "growing minds" who are on the
cusp of puberty and are exposed to pornography might become
desensitized to it and begin to think that is normal behaviour,
said Hucker. He adds that very little research has been
done into these sorts of crimes. Hamilton police are trying
to learn from the cases they've investigated.
The
12-year-old boy chose neighbourhood children as his targets.
One was an 11-year-old girl who he convinced to participate
in mutual touching. She was not forced, police say. The
other three victims were siblings, eight to 10. The encounters
occurred last spring and summer, in back yards and parks.
The
first adult to learn of it was the siblings' father. He
overheard two of his children talking at the breakfast
table. A comment was made that disturbed him. He began
to ask questions. After he got the answers, he called
police. That was last July. Arnold investigated the allegations.
Brought the 12-year-old boy and his shocked and horrified
parents in for questioning. The boy admitted what he had
done. He also dropped the bombshell that he had gotten
his ideas from pornography. After consulting with the
victims' families and the boy's parents, police chose
not to lay charges. Instead, alternative measures were
applied under the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the boy
was ordered to undergo counselling. "He was very
distraught. He was remorseful," said Arnold. In order
for alternative measures to be evoked under the YCJA,
an accused must first admit what they have done is wrong.
The
13-year-old boy performed sex acts on a 7-year-old girl
he babysat. The families of the boy and girl were friends
and nobody had any concerns about the babysitting arrangement.
The boy looked after the girl several times at her home.
Over a nine-month period, from December 2002 to August
2003, he persuaded her to touch him numerous times, Arnold
said. Eventually, the girl told her mother what was happening.
The mother did not initially call the police. "The
parents got the impression it was just an isolated incident,"
Arnold said. They spoke to the boy's parents and thought
it was resolved. It wasn't until later, when they realized
their daughter had been assaulted numerous times, that
police were contacted. This boy also admitted what he
had done. He revealed he was inspired by porn on cable
TV and the Internet. Again, no charges were laid. Counselling
was ordered under the YCJA. "He was quite a shy,
quiet young man. Quite embarrassed by the whole situation,"
said Arnold.
The
third investigation, which took place late last fall,
had a gender difference. This time, it was a girl accused
of sexually touching her victims. She had watched cable
porn while she was babysitting. She too was ordered to
have counselling. All three accused children are unlikely
to reoffend and are in a good position to be fully rehabilitated,
said Arnold.
sclairmont@thespec.com
or 905-526-3539
The
Hamilton Spectator - March 31, 2004
Letter: An evil disease
By Fr. Bohdan Hladio, Hamilton
RE:
'Porn gave kids knowhow to assault their friends' (March
25) Susan Clairmont's column is a wakeup call to all those
who regard pornography as nothing more than "harmless
entertainment."
While
sexual activity can be a great blessing, it can also contribute
to a personal, familial, and societal hell when misused.
The deeds of the young people mentioned in the article
are, unfortunately, only a symptom. The disease which
their actions point to is widespread in our society and
extremely destructive and evil in its consequences. I
pray that bringing incidences like this to light will
give all of us pause to consider the consequences of this
"innocent entertainment" and come to reconsider
the way our media and entertainment industries seem to
indiscriminately use sex simply to make money.
While
it's true that parents must monitor their children's behaviour,
even the best of children spend time away from their parents
and have a normal curiosity. They, as well as the thousands
of people exploited in the making of "adult"
films, shouldn't have to suffer because of the immorality
and greed of the pornography industry, as well as the
lack of moral backbone manifested by legislators and members
of the judiciary.
|