Conservatism diluted or abandoned?

True conservatism as Gerry Nicholls former NCC employee says below is about principles. There are true fiscal principles and social principles, and there is a link between them. Liberal secular principles are costing taxpayers massively in the area of social programs. Liberal social programs without fiscal principles is socialism.

But it seems both sets of principles have been pushed behind the curtain in the House of Commons. Maybe it is just because almost every government has come to operate without principles.

-- CFAC

Read Gerry's thought provoking column below:

Selling out true conservatism

By Gerry Nicholls

If Prime Minister Stephen Harper deserves credit for uniting the Conservative Party of Canada, he must also take the blame for dividing the conservative movement.

And make no mistake, Harper's deliberate strategy of diluting conservative principles and moving the party to the left has split the movement into two factions.

The members of one faction, who might be dubbed the "Tory Partisans," support the Prime Minister as they would support their favorite sports team. Ideology doesn't necessarily matter to them. What matters above all to Tory Partisans is winning.

The other faction, which might be called the "Principled Conservatives," are horrified with what Harper is doing; they believe the Conservative party must actually stand for certain values and ideas.

In other words, the Principled Conservatives want the Conservative party to be truly conservative-- that is, a party which stands for free enterprise and less government.

As for me, I am firmly in the Principled Conservative camp.

As a conservative activist for more than 20 years, I have always believed in the importance of linking principles with politics. What's the point of electing a Conservative government if it will act no differently from a Liberal government?

Or to put it another way, Canadians need a true choice when it comes to selecting their governments -- they need an alternative to the Liberals.

And to be blunt, the Tories have simply not delivered.

They have failed to cut back on the size of government, failed to control spending and failed to introduce broad-based tax cuts for both individuals and businesses.

Of course, the Tory Partisans have counterarguments to all this, which they trot out to defend Harper's "centrist" approach. Yet they are not so much arguments as myths.

And for the sake of Canada's conservative movement, we need to examine and debunk these myths once and for all. So here we go:

MYTH 1: CANADA IS A LEFT-WING COUNTRY

Both Tory Partisans and left-wing pundits propagate this myth, which claims that Canadians are too socialist to elect a truly conservative party. Too socialist? Tell that to Don Cherry. Tell that to Albertans. Tell that to the Ontarians who live in what the media likes to call "Harris Country." Or tell that to the Quebecois who live in a province where two of the three main provincial parties are right of centre. The fact is there are enough votes for a truly conservative party to win an election in this country. Somebody just has to go after them.

MYTH 2: CONSERVATIVE IDEOLOGY IS TOO SCARY

One of the oldest myths out there. Remember when pundits and media "experts" dismissed the electoral chances of conservatives like Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher and Mike Harris. They were all considered "too right wing" or "too scary." Yet they all achieved great success. Why? Because they stood for something. They had values. And there's nothing scary about promising to get government out of people's lives.

MYTH 3: MOVING LEFT IS JUST A TACTIC TO ENSURE A MAJORITY IN THE NEXT ELECTION

Three problems with this myth: First by moving to the left, the Tories are actually hurting their chances of winning a majority. Second, even if they do win a majority they won't have a mandate to implement a conservative agenda. Third, once you start making government bigger it's hard to make it smaller. As Reagan once put it, "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size ? a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this Earth."

MYTH 4: PRAGMATISM TRUMPS PRINCIPLE

Former Conservative campaign manager Tom Flanagan is the chief promoter of this myth. He recently wrote: "Too many years out of power have given conservatives an anti-government mentality. The whole point of merging the Canadian Alliance and the Progressive Conservatives was to create a political party that could win control of the federal government." Flanagan's wrong. The whole point of conservatism is to make government smaller. We are supposed to have an "anti-government mentality."

I do not seek to cast aspersions on Tory Partisans. They are right when they say that winning elections is important. But Tory Partisans must remember one key fact: They can't win elections without principled conservatives at their side.

Gerry_nicholls@hotmail.com

 

Page Tools:
Canada Family Action Coalition (CFAC) National Office
#204, 4080 - 23Street NE
Calgary, Alberta T2E 6W9
Phone: (403) 295-2159
Fax: (403) 291-2515
E-mail: info@familyaction.org
G
Clic ici pour une traduction automatisée de Google
Printer-Friendly Version of This Page
Email This Page
View CFAC's Legal Disclaimer
Download Adobe's Free PDF viewer

Sponsors





Interested in becoming a CFAC advertiser? Email us!

Questions or comments about this site may be sent directly to CFACat info@familyaction.org