Bill Threatens Religious
Free Speech, Say Pro-Family Leaders

By C. Gwendolyn Landolt
National Vice President
REAL Women of Canada

Pro-family activists are alarmed that legislation now before Parliament could result in criminal prosecutions against faith groups who publicly oppose homosexuality.

On May 29, the House of Commons, with only about a dozen MPs present, gave second reading or approval-in-principle to Bill C-415[*1], a private bill introduced by New Democrat MP Svend Robinson. If passed, it would amend sections 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code[*2], to the effect that anyone who "advocates or promotes genocide" or "incites hatred against any identifiable group" on the basis of sexual orientation would be breaking the law. Those convicted would face up to two years in jail. The bill is currently before the Commons Justice Committee[*3], and could be back before the House by October for a final vote. "It will curtail freedom of speech," REAL Women of Canada[*4] national vice-president Gwen Landolt told The Report. "Religious organizations and publications will be deeply affected."

Section 319 does contain several protections for expressing "an opinion on a religious subject." But section 318 does not. And that concerns Canadian Alliance justice critic Vic Toews[*5]. "Specific books of Islamic law dictate that homosexuals should be punished harshly. Under a broad definition of the law this could arguably fit into the definition of advocating genocide based on sexual orientation," he told MPs, according to Hansard[*6]. Certain Old and New Testament passages could also be judged by the courts to be "hate literature," which would impact Christians and Jews, he added. In an interview, Toews warned if that happened, it would likely prevent the Gideons[*7] and others from distributing Bibles in public places. Landolt even doubts that the exemptions in section 319 will do much good. "The law can be manipulated," she said.

Toews also questions why Robinson's bill does not include the disabled and the elderly who fear that they could be the victims of a so-called "mercy killing." "Why are those other groups being ignored?" Toews asks. "The answer is he's not really concerned about genocide, he's concerned firstly about strengthening the gay position in this country, and trying to stifle any criticism against homosexuality."

Alliance and pro-family Liberal MPs such as Dan McTeague[*8] say they will attempt to kill Bill C-145 at the Justice Committee. Failing that, says Toews, "we better make sure that there are appropriate defenses to protect religious freedoms and freedom of speech."

[*1] Footnote - online source
[*2] Footnote - online source
[*3] Footnote - online source
[*4] http://www.realwomenca.com
[*5] Footnote - online source
[*6] Footnote - online source
[*7] http://www.gideons.ca/
[*8] Footnote - online source
-

A Battle on Many Fronts

Bill C-415 is just one of several areas where homosexuals and their supporters are currently attempting to advance their cause in Canada. And that, says Janet Epp Buckingham, legal counsel to the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada[*1], makes it all the more important that people of faith not lose their right to be heard. "These issues are very much on the public agenda right now," she told TFN, "and we don't want to see this put a chill on legitimate religious expression of concerns about homosexuality and the way that it's being treated by the government."

The central issue, of course, is the definition of marriage. And despite the government's decision last week to appeal a lower-court ruling in Ontario which overturned that definition, at least three members of Cabinet would prefer to let this decision stand. As various media have reported, Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham, Industry Minister Allan Rock and Heritage Minister Sheila Copps have to date all publicly expressed support for letting homosexuals marry.

Rock and Graham made their pronouncements in Vancouver where they marched in that city's "gay pride" parade over the weekend. Some parade organizers had wanted to block Liberal MPs from participating unless they made their views on marriage known. That threat was later abandoned out of concern that it would be viewed as "censorship."

Meanwhile, homosexual-rights activists are threatening to lodge a complaint with the BC human-rights tribunal against civic officials in Terrace, Kelowna and Oliver. All three had bowed to complaints filed with the tribunal in 2000 for having balked at declaring "gay pride" days in their communities. As a result, they have now decided not to issue any more civic proclamations no matter what the event. But that, says lawyer Barbara Findlay, targets homosexuals for hatred. "It further contributes to the intolerance in the community," she told the Vancouver Sun. "By saying that they will not do any more proclamations, the eyes of the community may direct fault at our community."

As Vancouver's The Province commented in an editorial, "Go figure: civic officials violate human rights if they refuse to advertise and support gay pride days but it's okay for gay day organizers to refuse officials who don't bow to their political views."

But neither are pro-family advocates adverse to filing their own human-rights complaints. Last week, the No Committee 2006 - which wants to prevent Montreal from hosting the Gay Games in 2006 - complained to the Quebec Human Rights Commission against the Royal Bank of Canada. Last year, the bank had refused the committee's request to open an account on grounds that its stance incited discrimination against homosexuals. The committee argues that on the contrary, it was the victim of discrimination. A similar case decided in June of this year, the Ontario Human Rights Commission determined that a business could not reject a client simply because it did not share that client's viewpoint on homosexuality. Toronto printer Scott Brockie[*2] was required to pay $5,000 in damages to a pro-gay organization and to complete for it a print job which he had originally refused as incompatible with his Christian beliefs.

[*1] http://www.evangelicalfellowship.ca/
[*2] http://www.fotf.ca/familyfacts/tfn/2002/062602.html

 

[c] 2002 Focus on the Family Canada.

COMMENTS:
Direct email to comments-tfn@fotf.ca
You can also visit http://www.fotf.ca/lists.html

 

Page Tools:
Canada Family Action Coalition (CFAC) National Office
#204, 4080 - 23Street NE
Calgary, Alberta T2E 6W9
Phone: (403) 295-2159
Fax: (403) 291-2515
E-mail: info@familyaction.org
G
Clic ici pour une traduction automatisée de Google
Printer-Friendly Version of This Page
Email This Page
View CFAC's Legal Disclaimer
Download Adobe's Free PDF viewer

Sponsors





Interested in becoming a CFAC advertiser? Email us!

Questions or comments about this site may be sent directly to CFACat info@familyaction.org