|
"Nothing
is politically right which is morally wrong" -- Daniel
OConnell
The
above quote by the famous Irish statesman certainly does
not apply in Canada today. In present day Canada: Anything
is politically right that is morally wrong.
Witness
the frenzy and the attacks on M.P Elsie Wayne for speaking
the truth on the homosexual lifestyle. Ms. Wayne had the
courage to state in parliament: "that homosexuals
should shut up about their lifestyle and complained
that Canadians should not have to tolerate gay pride parades,
drag queens and same-sex marriages." (National Post,
May 9, 2003.)
Hell
hath no fury like the homosexual lifestyle scorned. The
screams of outrage rang through the halls of parliament
and could also be heard in all the politically correct
media. One radio report was heard to remark that Ms. Waynes
words were a "rant." It then went on to say
her "behaviour was disgusting."
Well,
excuse me, but when is telling the truth "disgusting"?!?!
The homosexual lifestyle brings disease and death to many
of those who practice it. The highest percentage of AIDS
cases in Canada are in the homosexual community. The Krever
Inquiry into the tainted blood supply in Canada stated
that the blood supply in Canada was contaminated because
those in charge were afraid to ask homosexuals if they
had been sexually active. And of course our politically
correct, gay - approving media did its best to cover up
this fact. There were a few courageous reporters who did
expose this, but only a few. AIDS is costing our health
care system billions, but hey, one should not be "intolerant"
or "bigoted" and speak the truth.
What
is "disgusting behavior" in this country is
a sexual lifestyle that is hailed as a "right,"
when it is a behaviour that if practiced, can kill. It
can also be a safety hazard to public health. Witness
the evidence in the tainted blood scandal.
Now
we have another scandal on our hands. The hound dogs of
the politically correct are crying out for the blood of
Elsie Wayne and leading the pack are the political hyenas
on parliament hill. Joe Clark, M.P. leader of the Conservative
Party was quoted in the National Post as saying about
his deputy leader Elsie Wayne on the homosexual issue:
"Elsie has extreme views on that issue." Ms.
Wayne is quoted in this National Post article as calling
the gay lifestyle, unfortunate and not
natural. Since when is it "extreme" to
state the obvious? Oh, I forgot, one must not criticize
this protected behaviour. After all, to speak the truth
will soon be classified as a "hate crime."
Not
to be outdone, former NDP leader Alexa McDonough called
it hatemongering. (Globe and Mail, May 9,
2003.) And in an article on C-News of May 9, 2003, Ms.
McDonough was quoted as saying Ms. Wayne was, spewing
hatred, and being venomous. And in the
same Globe and Mail article, another M.P., Scott Brison
called it rabid prejudice. The article also
stated that NDP M.P. Libby Davies, "argued that Ms.
Waynes remarks violated the privileges of fellow
MPs." It beats me how anyone stating the truth
can violate anyones "privileges." Oh,
I forgot, nonsense is the standard in this house on the
hill. Another M.P., John Herron, is quoted as saying in
the same article: The language was incredibly excessive,
it was intolerant, it was way over the top.
Many
people in this country think many members of parliament
have gone over the top. Why else would so-called intelligent
people even be discussing this absurdity called "same-sex
marriage?" Have they gone off their rocker? Or is
there a method in their madness? An editorial in the National
Post of March 1, 2000, headlined "An open conspiracy"
had the words below the headline: "Justice minister
too close with gay lobby on same-sex marriages."
The editorial went on to say: "This open conspiracy
involving the courts, the Justice Department and the gay
lobby is no figment of conservative paranoia..."
There
is something haywire in this country when a person can
be vilified and ridiculed for speaking out for decency
and morality. But what is even worse, is that some of
our so-called elected representatives would stoop to character
assassination of an admirable and brave woman for stating
the truth. This woman has served her country and constituents
well and been elected in nine elections. Is no one allowed
to criticize or expose homosexual behaviour? Why is it
they have so much power in parliament, in the courts and
in the media? Do they have some kind of hold over people
in positions of power? Why are they allowed to dictate
to the majority in this country? Do they have a lock on
freedom of speech and freedom of expression? Will people
continue to be attacked, smeared and pilloried for speaking
the truth about this lifestyle that brings disease and
death to many of those who practice it? Answers are needed
and the truth needs to be told.
Stephen
Gray
graysinfo@telus.net
website http://www.geocities.com/graysinfo
May 11, 2003
Some
info on the Author: Stephen Gray is a writer and
researcher on various topics. He published a newsletter
for 11 years exposing the misuse of trade union time and
money.
|